Court Of Appeals

Home>Topics>Court Of Appeals
Refine Results
  1. All
  2. Articles
  3. Online Articles
  4. Magazine Articles
  5. Videos
  1. Viewpoint: Trump does away with EPA by appointing Pruitt as EPA administrator

    A date which already lives in infamy could assume a new significance for members of the renewables sector with the appointment of Scott Pruitt as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by President-elect Donald Trump earlier today. Pruitt -- a Republican who currently serves as the attorney general for Oklahoma -- has been a staunch supporter of fossil fuel industries throughout his career, and was in fact one of several state attorney generals who began preparing to battle the then-unannounced Clean Power Plan as early as 2014. The controversial plan was unveiled by President Barack Obama and the EPA in August 2015 and seeks to significantly reduce the U.S.' greenhouse gas emissions -- primarily through the development of renewable generating sources and what Trump referred to as the "war on coal" while on the campaign trail. Pruitt was among 28 other state attorney generals and hundreds of companies who would eventually file suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in opposition of the Clean Power Plan. A decision is still pending, though the expectation is that it will eventually appear before the U.S. Supreme Court. What does it all mean? Pruitt's nomination seems to be squarely in line Trump's goal of stymieing an agency that he promised to "get rid of in almost every form," but before continuing I'll step aside momentarily and let Ken Cook, president of the watchdog organization Environmental Working Group, share his thoughts: During the campaign, Mr. Trump regularly threatened to dismantle the EPA and roll back many of the gains made to reduce Americans' exposures to industrial pollution, and with Pruitt, the President-elect would make good on those threats. Its a safe assumption that Pruitt could be the most hostile EPA administrator toward clean air and safe drinking water in history. While Cook is undoubtedly speaking toward the full length of Pruitt's term, more pressing is how he -- and Trump's White House -- will handle the EPA's Clean Power Plan. Hypothetically speaking, the Supreme Court's litigation could be nullified should Trump issue what would essentially be a stop-work order to all federal agencies working on Obama carryovers -- presumably including the Clean Power Plan -- though in practice, precedent has shown that few such orders are ever executed in full. A semi-obscure law known as the Congressional Review Act could also spell doom for the Clean Power Plan, but not without a number of caveats that could make its application difficult. The legislation, passed during President Bill Clinton's first term, is an oversight tool that can be invoked to overturn rules issued by federal agencies. The CRA relies on a simple majority vote, which could be scary given Republicans hold both the House and Senate. Democrats have already alluded to filibustering any major changes to the plan, however, and Congress would have to decide if changing it would take priority over any number of other significant reforms promised by Trump through the campaign. Buckling in for the long-haul Exactly what Pruitt's tenure might ultimately mean for the EPA remains to be seen, and though his pro-fossil fuel attitude (and strong legal knowledge) could certainly hinder renewable-friendly policies established by the Obama Administration, a total overhaul of the agency seems unlikely given protections established decades ago by policies including the Clean Air and Clean Water acts. As I speculated following Trump's election, however, the lack of guidance toward renewables from the White House (and presumably now the EPA) could still largely be nullified by the states. Pruitt made it clear during his time as attorney general in Oklahoma that, while he is vehemently opposed to federally-mandated climate change policies, individual states should be free to what is in their best interest. This is at least somewhat reassuring as the number of other states that have adopted or are considering renewable portfolio standards  continues to increase . Do you have thoughts or comments about the presidential election? The Hydro Group would like to hear them. Send feedback to Michael Harris  here .

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Thu, 8 Dec 2016

  2. Plans for Carlsbad Energy Center Upheld by Appeals Court

    The move clears the way for development on NRG’s natural gas-fired, 558-MW, $2.2 billion Carlsbad Energy Center,

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Mon, 5 Dec 2016

  3. Push to Close Indian Point Nuclear Plant Granted Court Win

    The ruling states the plant must have a review to determine whether it meets current environmental standards before its federal licenses can be renewed.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Tue, 22 Nov 2016

  4. Nuclear Power: Court says New York has right to review nuclear plant permit

    New York's Department of State has the right to review federal relicensing applications for the Indian Point nuclear power facility on the lower Hudson River to ensure compliance with coastal management protections, the state's highest court ruled on Monday.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Wed, 23 Nov 2016

  1. US Court of Appeals Rejects Stay Against Clean Power Plan

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Thu, 21 Jan 2016

  2. Court of Appeals supports NRC decision approving Harris spent fuel storage plan

    A U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in an appeal brought by Orange County, N.C.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Mon, 23 Sep 2002

  3. Wisconsin Court of Appeals overturns punitive damage award

    The Wisconsin Court of Appeals today overturned the $100 million punitive damage award against Wisconsin Electric (WE) in the company's appeal against the City of West Allis, Kearney & Trecker Corp., and Giddings & Lewis, Inc.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Wed, 5 Sep 2001

  4. API: Court of Appeals review of hydraulic fracturing bans could open economic opportunity

    New York State Petroleum Council Executive Director Karen Moreau welcomed the decision by New York’s Court of Appeals to hear from local landowners and the oil and natural gas industry on hydraulic fracturing bans.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Fri, 30 Aug 2013

  5. Texas Interests Score Important Appeals Court Win on EPA Haze

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District has handed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), Oklahoma, Luminant Generation and other parties a key victory against regional haze standards being implemented by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Wed, 20 Jul 2016

  6. Oil & Gas News: U.S. Appeals Court affirms RICO judgment against lawyer behind fraudulent Ecuador lawsuit

    The U.S. Court of Appeals has unanimously affirmed a lower court decision, which found that the $9.5 billion judgment against oil & gas giant, Chevron Corporation, in Ecuador was the product of fraud and racketeering activity, and unenforceable in the U.S.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Mon, 8 Aug 2016

  7. US Court upholds PEMEX platform claim

    The United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a judgment of more than $465 million for KBR subsidiary Commisa against PEMEX following a decade of litigation.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Wed, 3 Aug 2016

  8. Cape Wind Project Suffers July 5 Loss at Federal Appeals Court

    A three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on July 5 threw out two government approvals for the Cape Wind Energy Project, which is a proposal to generate electricity from windmills off the coast of Massachusetts.

    Online Articles

    Online Articles

    Wed, 6 Jul 2016

Get More Results