PSA invites industry players to discuss contractors' responsibility and role for leaks

Source: Petroleum Safety Authority Norway
Petroleum Safety Authority Norway logo

Friday last week, the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA) invited the most important players within design, construction and modification of process facilities to a joint meeting. The topic for discussion was the contractors' responsibility and role in relation to risk of hydrocarbon leaks on the Norwegian shelf.

"The purpose of the meeting was to identify areas of responsibility associated with technical and organisational barriers, where also the contractors can contribute to reduce the risk of major accidents," says Semsudin Leto, supervision coordinator in the PSA.

Causes and measures
Hydrocarbon leaks are a key contributor to major accident risk in the Norwegian petroleum industry. The PSA has therefore commissioned a study of causal relations and measures related to hydrocarbon leaks on the Norwegian shelf as part of the annual report Risk level in the Norwegian petroleum industry.

The purpose of the meeting was to review findings from the study, and to discuss challenges which are particularly relevant for maintenance and modification contractors (M&M contractors).

Challenges
The carbon leak study points out four challenges involving the contractor role:

- design-related issues as key cause
- lessons learned from previous incidents
- preparation of specific measures following incidents
- risk assessments and analyses.

Issues specifically raised during the meeting were related to design, redesign and construction of process facilities. Conditions concerning the relationship between the contractor and operator were also discussed.

From the industry, Aibel and Aker Solutions presented their experiences from their roles in preventing hydrocarbon leaks.

Transfer of experience
Feedback from the contractors shows the need for further transfer of experience. The PSA and the contractors will therefore consider what would be suitable forums for such exchange of experience. This applies both to transfer of experience between the individual contracting companies, as well as between the operating companies as users of the process facilities, and the onshore engineering environments.

Whitepapers

OSHA 1910.269 Are You Regulation Ready?

Read this Q&A to learn about changes to federal regulations and how to select FR garments for...

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New ...

On the Radar: EMC Supplier Exchange

This report addresses key issues for managers of complex contracts in energy and engineering. Thi...

Learn the four stages to operational excellence

Managing an energy facility is complex and challenging.  At times, it may seem that improvin...

Webcasts

Transforming the petroleum supply chain with the Internet of Things

The equipment involved in producing, moving, refining and selling petroleum is expensive, and rugged, and comes from hundreds of manufacturers. Enhanced by the Internet of Thing...
( 06/16/2015 / 02:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time / 01:00 PM Central Daylight Time / 11:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time / 18:00 GMT )
Sponsored by

Connected Decision-Making: Improving Asset Operations Through Comprehensive Information Management

Energy asset operators are faced with a paradigm today: increase efficiency and reliability levels while fighting to extend the lifespan of these aging asset. To meet these oppo...
Sponsored by

Turnaround Bolting Optimization

Improving turnaround safety, quality and schedule with innovative bolting methods. Join our speakers as they address the following topics: Improving job-site safety with innov...
Sponsored by

Latest Energy Jobs

View more Job Listings >>