California Commission Staff Lays Out Revamped Palmdale Power Project


A Preliminary Staff Assessment (PSA) was issued March 23 by the California Energy Commission staff on the Palmdale Energy Project (PEP) Petition to Amend (PTA).

The PSA examines engineering, environmental, public health and safety aspects of the PEP project, based on the information provided by applicant Palmdale Energy LLC and other sources available at the time the PSA was prepared. After a 30-day public comment period on the PSA, staff will issue its testimony in the form of the Final Staff Assessment (FSA).

In the evidentiary hearings, a committee of commission members will consider the recommendations presented by staff, the petitioner, intervenors, governmental agencies, tribes, and the public prior to submitting its Presiding Member’s Proposed Decision (PMPD) to the full commission. Following a public hearing(s), the full commission will make a final decision on the proposed modifications.

This project, then called the Palmdale Hybrid Power Project (PHPP), was originally licensed as a nominal 570-MW hybrid facility utilizing combined-cycle and solar trough technologies located in the city of Palmdale and backed by the city itself. However, the facility was not constructed.

The project owner submitted a revised comprehensive PTA on July 17, 2015, also requesting to rename the project the Palmdale Energy Project (PEP).

Construction of the proposed PEP would require permanent use of a 50-acre site for the power plant site, and an additional separate 20 acres for construction laydown and parking, located adjacent and north of the proposed power plant site. After completion of the project, the 20-acre parcel would be restored and re-vegetated, if necessary, and remain under the ownership of the city of Palmdale.

The revamped project includes:

  • Replacement of the General Electric gas turbines with new Siemens SGT6-5000Fs to meet pending need for “Flexible Resources” to support integration of renewable energy;
  • A new steam turbine;
  • A new auxiliary boiler;
  • Elimination of the solar components of the approved project;
  • Elimination of brine concentrator/crystallizer systems;
  • Replacement of the wet cooling towers with an ACC;
  • Reduction of the site from 333 acres to 50 acres;
  • Reorientation of the power block with the HRSG stacks now on the east and the combustion turbine inlets to the west;
  • Relocation of the point where the 230 kV transmission line turns south to the generating facility from East Avenue M to a point approximately 1,800 feet further west on East Avenue M;
  • Addition of three 230 kV transmission line towers along the south side of East Avenue M north of the project site and extension of the generation tie-line westerly approximately 1,800 feet along the south side of East Avenue M;
  • Addition of waste stream consisting of combustion turbine inlet evaporative cooler blow down, water treatment system reject, and plant drains;
  • Change in the water steam cycle chemistry control system from a phosphate based system to an all volatile system; and
  • Possible change from a CO2 based fire suppression system for some components to an FM200 based system.

The PTA primarily proposes to eliminate the solar thermal component of the project, to change the combustion turbine generator technology, to change the cooling mechanism from water cooling to an Air Cooled Condenser (ACC), and to remove the Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system, among other technical changes.

The proposed PEP is being designed with the capacity to operate under three different profiles. The proposed PEP would operate as a baseload power plant with an estimated operational ability of up to 8,000 hours per year, with a capacity factor of 60-80 percent. In addition to the base load operational profile, and in response to changing market conditions, the proposed PEP will have the capability to operate under two additional peaking or cycling type profiles.

The PEP consists of a 699.4-MW (net) (nominal capacity of 654 MW) two-on-one natural gas-fired combined cycle generating station. Primary equipment would include two Siemens SGT6-5000F natural gas-fired combustion turbine-generators (CTGs) rated at 220 MW each, two heat recovery steam generators (HRSG), one steam turbine-generator (STG) rated at 232 MW, and one auxiliary boiler to provide sealing steam, allowing startup of the steam turbine shortly after the gas turbines.

This article was republished with permission from Generation Hub.

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now


Making DDoS Mitigation Part of Your Incident Response Plan: Critical Steps and Best Practices

Like a new virulent strain of flu, the impact of a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack is...

The Multi-Tax Challenge of Managing Excise Tax and Sales Tax

To be able to accurately calculate multiple tax types, companies must be prepared to continually ...

Operational Analytics in the Power Industry

Cloud computing, smart grids, and other technologies are changing transmission and distribution. ...

Maximizing Operational Excellence

In a recent survey conducted by PennEnergy Research, 70% of surveyed energy industry professional...