In a joint statement, the companies said they’ll show the department “underestimated the highly competitive nature of the oil-field services industry, the many benefits of the proposed combination, and the sufficiency of the divestitures” Halliburton has proposed to address questions about competitive effects.
DOJ said its lawsuit alleges Halliburton’s proposed takeover of Baker Hughes, valued at $34 billion when announced in November 2014, “threatens to eliminate competition, raise prices, and reduce innovation in the oil-field services industry (OGJ Online, Nov. 17, 2014).”
The complaint, according to a department statement, says proposed divestitures “would not include full business units but rather would be limited to certain assets, with the merged firm holding onto important facilities, employees, contracts, intellectual property, and research and development resources that would put the buyer of those assets at a competitive disadvantage.”
It says Halliburton would be able to retain valuable assets of both companies while selling “less significant assets.”
And it alleges “this divestiture would not replicate the substantial competition between the two rivals that exists today.”