Court ruling clouds ownership of Marcellus gas

By OGJ editors

A ruling by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has introduced uncertainty into the ownership of natural gas in the Marcellus shale in the state.

In the Butler case, the court remanded a lower court ruling and held that plaintiffs should be given the right to develop a record to prove that Marcellus shale gas is not the type of gas contemplated in an earlier case known as Dunham and that shale may be more similar to coal than to conventional oil and gas reservoirs.

Under Pennsylvania’s nearly unique position that coalbed methane is owned by the owner of the coal, could cause some companies to defer drilling on parcels that rely on any application of the Dunham ruling, said Russell Schetroma of the energy team at Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, Canonsburg, Pa.

Schectoma called the ruling “unfortunate” and said it has “the potential for judicially-caused land title chaos affecting the Commonwealth’s greatest potential driver of wealth and employment.”

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now


Logistics Risk Management in the Transformer Industry

Transformers often are shipped thousands of miles, involving multiple handoffs,and more than a do...

Secrets of Barco UniSee Mount Revealed

Last year Barco introduced UniSee, a revolutionary large-scale visualization platform designed to...

The Time is Right for Optimum Reliability: Capital-Intensive Industries and Asset Performance Management

Imagine a plant that is no longer at risk of a random shutdown. Imagine not worrying about losing...

Going Digital: The New Normal in Oil & Gas

In this whitepaper you will learn how Keystone Engineering, ONGC, and Saipem are using software t...