Court ruling clouds ownership of Marcellus gas

By OGJ editors

A ruling by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania has introduced uncertainty into the ownership of natural gas in the Marcellus shale in the state.

In the Butler case, the court remanded a lower court ruling and held that plaintiffs should be given the right to develop a record to prove that Marcellus shale gas is not the type of gas contemplated in an earlier case known as Dunham and that shale may be more similar to coal than to conventional oil and gas reservoirs.

Under Pennsylvania’s nearly unique position that coalbed methane is owned by the owner of the coal, could cause some companies to defer drilling on parcels that rely on any application of the Dunham ruling, said Russell Schetroma of the energy team at Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, Canonsburg, Pa.

Schectoma called the ruling “unfortunate” and said it has “the potential for judicially-caused land title chaos affecting the Commonwealth’s greatest potential driver of wealth and employment.”

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now


Maximizing Operational Excellence

In a recent survey conducted by PennEnergy Research, 70% of surveyed energy industry professional...

Leveraging the Power of Information in the Energy Industry

Information Governance is about more than compliance. It’s about using your information to drive ...

Reduce Engineering Project Complexity

Engineering document management presents unique and complex challenges. A solution based in Enter...

Revolutionizing Asset Management in the Electric Power Industry

With the arrival of the Industrial Internet of Things, data is growing and becoming more accessib...