Pre-FID project deferrals contribute to $200B hole in investment pipeline

The dramatic fall in oil prices in 2014 and subsequent dismantling of 2015 company budgets has, by mid-year, already resulted in over 45 major project final investment decision (FID) deferrals. As a result, Wood Mackenzie estimates that 20 billion boe of reserves has been pushed back from a diverse range of onshore, shallow-water, and deepwater projects. Together, this creates a US$200 billion hole in the industry’s investment pipeline.

Projects that are technically challenging, and that have upfront costs and/or low returns, have proved vulnerable – over 50% of the 20 billion boe is located in deepwater projects, and nearly 30% in the Canadian oil sands.

From a corporate perspective, there are two main drivers for deferring projects: releasing capital in response to the fall in oil prices, and giving more time to develop enhanced designs, cost optimization, and other measures to improve overall economics – in other words, rebuilding projects for a lower price environment.

Inflationary pressures have pushed many projects into economically marginal territory and operators are now reworking costs and development solutions to achieve their hurdle rates. But it won’t be easy. Wood Mackenzie estimates that half of the new greenfield developments still produce sub-15% development IRRs, which is below most companies’ economic hurdle rate.

For most operators, hoping that a 10% reduction in CAPEX is sufficient to reach FID won’t be enough, as only a handful have an NPV10 breakeven below US$50/bbl.

“Given where we are in the corporate CAPEX cycle, only those assets with the most robust economics can expect to make the grade,” said Angus Rodger, a principal analyst with Wood Mackenzie. “We estimate that the majority of these projects are now targeting startup between 2019 and 2023. However, if the major IOCs continue to focus on cutting future capital commitments – to the detriment of future production growth – then these dates will be pushed back further.

“For some, aggressive re-phasing of capital spend and savings from cost deflation will enable them to have another run at FID over the next six to 12 months,” Rodger added. “But, in a world of greater financial discipline and lower oil prices, others will require more radical changes to make them attractive investments.”


Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now


Logistics Risk Management in the Transformer Industry

Transformers often are shipped thousands of miles, involving multiple handoffs,and more than a do...

Secrets of Barco UniSee Mount Revealed

Last year Barco introduced UniSee, a revolutionary large-scale visualization platform designed to...

The Time is Right for Optimum Reliability: Capital-Intensive Industries and Asset Performance Management

Imagine a plant that is no longer at risk of a random shutdown. Imagine not worrying about losing...

Going Digital: The New Normal in Oil & Gas

In this whitepaper you will learn how Keystone Engineering, ONGC, and Saipem are using software t...