Anadarko to pay $159.5 million for Macondo incident

Offshore staff

HOUSTON Anadarko Petroleum Corp. was ordered to pay almost $160 million for its role as part-owner of the Gulf of Mexico well that in 2010 caused the biggest offshore oil spill in US history, according to Bloomberg.

Monday’s order comes after the government told US District Judge Carl Barbier in New Orleans that the company should be fined more than $1 billion for its role in the well’s blowout, which killed 11 people and spewed oil for almost three months.

Anadarko, which had a 25% stake in the Macondo well, argued it should not be required to pay fines simply because it owned part of the well, as the accident was not its fault. In 2014,

The Woodlands, Texas-based company set aside $90 million for the case when it offered to settle for that amount.

Barbier said the fine reflected his finding that Anadarko did not have a role in causing the spill. Under the law, he could have imposed as much as $1,100 per barrel of oil spilled, or about $3.5 billion. The fine is “only 4.5% of the maximum penalty, and therefore on the low end of the spectrum,” Barbier said in his order, Bloomberg reported. “The court finds this amount strikes the appropriate balance between Anadarko’s lack of culpability and the extreme seriousness of this spill.”

Barbier rejected Anadarko’s argument that a heavy penalty could cause minority partners to seek a larger role in offshore operations, which might complicate safety and drilling decisions. “A penalty of this size might encourage non-operators to avoid investing with careless operators,” he said.

The company said it is pleased the penalty is less than what the government sought and that it is reviewing whether to file an appeal.

“While we respect the court’s decision, we continue to believe that penalizing a non-operator for events beyond its control is inconsistent with the intent of the Clean Water Act,” Anadarko said in a statement posted on its website.

David Berg, a Houston attorney who has tracked the oil spill litigation and often sues polluters on behalf of municipalities, said given the damage from the spill, the fine is “not a slap on the wrist; it’s a tongue kiss from the judge.”

David Uhlmann, former head of the Justice Department’s environmental crimes unit, said the fine is “too small to be an effective deterrent.” It “will not have a significant effect on a company worth approximately $30 billion,” said Uhlmann, now a University of Michigan law professor.

The professor said Anadarko was not a silent partner in its dealings with BP Plc, which owned 65% of the well.

“Anadarko urged BP to continue drilling deeper, even when BP wanted to stop,” he said. “Yet the judge refused to consider evidence of Anadarko’s risky behavior, which may explain the small size of Anadarko’s fine.”

BP agreed in July to pay $5.5 billion in pollution fines as a part of a $20.8-billion settlement with the US and five Gulf states. That came on top of billions of dollars already spent on response, clean-up and compensation, pushing BP to raise its budget for the spill to $55 billion.

The Macondo blowout destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and sparked thousands of lawsuits against BP, as well as Vernier, Switzerland-based Transocean Ltd., owner of the rig, and Houston-based Halliburton Co., which provided cementing services for the project.

The US sued BP and Anadarko in December 2010. Anadarko agreed the following year to pay $4 billion to London-based BP to cover its share of all public and private oil-spill damage claims, cleanup costs, and damage assessments. That deal did not cover any pollution fines or penalties Anadarko might face.

In 2012, Barbier ruled the companies were automatically liable for civil penalties under the Clean Water Act as co-owners of the well. That decision, upheld by the US Supreme Court, left both companies vulnerable to fines of $1,100 per barrel spilled.

A separate decision by Barbier in 2014 that BP was grossly negligent in causing the spill, allowed for potential pollution fines against BP to be almost quadrupled. To calculate the penalty, Barbier determined in January 2014 that 3.19 MMbbl were spilled.

Anadarko was not vulnerable to the higher fines because Barbier had previously ruled it did not cause the accident. The judge would not allow the US to argue otherwise in a trial over penalties. Fines under the Clean Water Act total $1 billion for Transocean.

The other partner in the well, Mitsui & Co.’s Moex Offshore 2007 LLC, which owned a 10% share, settled state and US pollution law claims in 2012 for $90 million and paid BP more than $1 billion in 2011 for its share of spill costs.


Share your news with Offshore at

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now


The Time is Right for Optimum Reliability: Capital-Intensive Industries and Asset Performance Management

Imagine a plant that is no longer at risk of a random shutdown. Imagine not worrying about losing...

Going Digital: The New Normal in Oil & Gas

In this whitepaper you will learn how Keystone Engineering, ONGC, and Saipem are using software t...

Maximizing Operational Excellence

In a recent survey conducted by PennEnergy Research, 70% of surveyed energy industry professional...

Leveraging the Power of Information in the Energy Industry

Information Governance is about more than compliance. It’s about using your information to drive ...