Report finds majority of oil and gas capital project joint ventures exceed budget

Offshore staff

LONDON – Analysis of 333 current oil and gas capital projects revealed that 92% of joint venture (JV) arrangements experienced cost and schedule overruns compared to 83% of non-JVs, according to EY’s new report “Joint ventures for oil and gas megaprojects.”

Inappropriate structures, selecting unsuitable partners, or engaging in an inadequate commercial structure ─ which fail to align or flex to changing participant strategic priorities ─ are the most common downfalls of these JVs, according to the new analysis. Continued oil price volatility and escalation of geopolitical tensions are also adding considerable strain to many JVs.

The report also finds that while the probability of cost and schedule overruns is higher in projects that are JV led, they tend to fare better on the extent of failure compared to non-JV projects. For overrunning projects, completion costs were, on average, 107% above target for non-JVs and 84% above target for JVs.

 “JVs add both value and complexity to a project,” Axel Preiss, Global Oil & Gas Advisory Leader at EY, said. “Companies tend to invest the most time and resources into pre-signature due diligence but often fail to properly maintain investment and oversight once the JV commences. This is where most problems begin.”

JVs arranged prior to the drop in oil price may now include partners under severe financial stress and whose priorities and willingness to invest may have changed significantly. This can, in the worst instances, lead to JV exits. In today’s environment, companies must invest in alignment between partners while preparing for the risk of exit to reduce market shock.

“It is not unusual for individual company objectives to change over the long life cycle of these major projects, and we can expect that some JV performances to suffer further as geopolitical issues and oil price uncertainty persists in today’s market,” Preiss said. “Too often there is a failure within the JV to maintain trust and alignment of strategic objectives between partners.

“This creates even greater performance challenges. Project developers must effectively set up and manage JVs on an ongoing basis to preserve support and investment in these large capital projects.”

10/29/2015

 

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now

Whitepapers

The Time is Right for Optimum Reliability: Capital-Intensive Industries and Asset Performance Management

Imagine a plant that is no longer at risk of a random shutdown. Imagine not worrying about losing...

Going Digital: The New Normal in Oil & Gas

In this whitepaper you will learn how Keystone Engineering, ONGC, and Saipem are using software t...

Maximizing Operational Excellence

In a recent survey conducted by PennEnergy Research, 70% of surveyed energy industry professional...

Leveraging the Power of Information in the Energy Industry

Information Governance is about more than compliance. It’s about using your information to drive ...