FERC grants permit for 8-MW Bosher Dam hydro project in Virginia

Hydro plant

Editor's Note: This content was originally featured on GenerationHub.com. GenerationHub.com is a sister site of HydroWorld.com that covers power generation in a number of renewable and non-renewable forms.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on July 12 approved a Feb. 19 application from Energy Resources USA Inc. for a preliminary permit to study the feasibility of the proposed 8-MW Bosher hydroelectric project, to be located at the existing Bosher Dam on the James River about two miles southwest of Tuckahoe in Henrico County, Virginia.

The proposed project would consist of: the existing 12-foot-high dam; a 1,000-acre impoundment with a storage capacity of 2,100 acre-feet and drainage area of 6,753 square miles; a new 700-foot-long, 180-foot-wide intake; a new 300-foot-long, 180-foot-wide tailrace; four new 2-MW turbines; a new 65-foot-long, 197-foot-wide powerhouse; a new 60-foot-long, 50-foot-wide substation; and a new 528-foot-long, 69-kV transmission line. The estimated annual generation of the project would be 68,500 MWh.

Comments were filed by parties like the James River Association, Virginia’s Department of Conservation and Recreation and the City of Richmond’s Department of Public Utilities (City DPU).

The City DPU, James River Association and others questioned the need for the project, stating that the project area is already served by three major power plants and a number of co-generation plants. FERC noted that it does not condition issuance of a preliminary permit upon a finding that it is in the public interest because to make such a finding would require the information and conclusions that are to be developed during the permit phase. So it didn't rule on that complaint.

The city of Richmond asserted that the project may interfere with its water rights, the city’s shared ownership interest in Bosher Dam and the Kanawha Canal, and various withdrawal and instream benefits provided by the James River. The City DPU and James River Association also expressed concerns related to the city’s water withdrawal rights. Said FERC: "However, the Commission does not require an applicant for a preliminary permit to acquire, as a prerequisite to receiving a permit, all rights, such as water rights, that may be necessary for the operation of the proposed project. Determining the water rights necessary for project operation is a matter to be evaluated during the permit term."

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now

Whitepapers

The Time is Right for Optimum Reliability: Capital-Intensive Industries and Asset Performance Management

Imagine a plant that is no longer at risk of a random shutdown. Imagine not worrying about losing...

Going Digital: The New Normal in Oil & Gas

In this whitepaper you will learn how Keystone Engineering, ONGC, and Saipem are using software t...

Maximizing Operational Excellence

In a recent survey conducted by PennEnergy Research, 70% of surveyed energy industry professional...

Leveraging the Power of Information in the Energy Industry

Information Governance is about more than compliance. It’s about using your information to drive ...

Latest PennEnergy Jobs

PennEnergy Oil & Gas Jobs