American Transmission to improve Wisconsin power line

transmission construction project jcp&l elp 1

The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin on June 16 issued a notice saying it won’t need to write an environmental impact statement on planned transmission projects of American Transmission Co.

ATC is seeking approval from the commission to improve the existing M13 single-circuit 115-kV transmission line, between the Kelly Substation in Marathon County, the Bunker Hill Substation in Lincoln County, and the Blackbrook Substation in Langlade County, known as the Line M13 Reinforcement Project.

In this project, ATC proposes to:

·      build a new 115 kV substation (Ackley Substation) located between the Bunker Hill and Blackbrook Substations;

·      rebuild Line M13 as double-circuit 115 kV between the Bunker Hill and Blackbrook Substations;

·      retire and remove the Bunker Hill and Blackbrook Substations; and

·      uprate Line M13 from the Bunker Hill Substation to the Kelly Substation.

ATC states that the project is needed to mitigate potential single-contingency overloads on Line M13, replace aging infrastructure on Line M13, and improve transmission system protection.

The route of the rebuild portion of the project begins at the Blackbrook Substation in the town of Ackley, Langlade County and follows the existing Line M-13 route west to the proposed Ackley Substation in the town of Pine River, Lincoln County. The rebuild would take place adjacent to the existing M13 line. The route of the uprate follows the existing M13 route south from the proposed Ackley Substation to the Kelly Substation in the village of Weston, Marathon County.

This is a Type II action under Wisconsin code, which requires the preparation of an environmental assessment to determine whether an environmental impact statement is necessary.

Based on the assessment prepared by commission staff, a preliminary determination indicates that the project would have some temporary and long-term social/community impacts and effects on natural resources. Strategies to avoid or mitigate some of the temporary and long-term impacts are available and would be implemented if the project is approved. Thus, the proposed project is not expected to affect the quality of the human environment and preparation of an impact statement is not required, the commission said.

Comments on the finding of no significant impact for this proposed project must be received by Friday, July 1, 2016.

Did You Like this Article? Get All the Energy Industry News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to an email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now


Making DDoS Mitigation Part of Your Incident Response Plan: Critical Steps and Best Practices

Like a new virulent strain of flu, the impact of a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack is...

The Multi-Tax Challenge of Managing Excise Tax and Sales Tax

To be able to accurately calculate multiple tax types, companies must be prepared to continually ...

Operational Analytics in the Power Industry

Cloud computing, smart grids, and other technologies are changing transmission and distribution. ...

Maximizing Operational Excellence

In a recent survey conducted by PennEnergy Research, 70% of surveyed energy industry professional...

Latest Energy Jobs

View more Job Listings >>

Archived Articles

PennEnergy Articles
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

OGJ Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

OGFJ Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

Power Engineering Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

Power Engineering Intl Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

Utility Products Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

HydroWorld Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

COSPP Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013

ELP Articles
2011 | 2012 | 2013